关于冻结议案原力社群若干意见



    1. eosc并没有ico,eosforce创始团队发
      起eosforce mainnet是通过共识发币。没有激活的帐户不认可这个共识.
    2. 重大提案提交讨论前至少三天应该通过转账方式通知帐户超过10 eosc的持有人。
    3. 超级节点和候选节点对议案的观点要提前告诉原力社群,然后币东按节点观点投票节点。
    4. 免费激活eosc是对当今持有人的剥削。
    5. eosforce节点缴纳高额的押金,對不参加会议的节點扣除押金。
    6. 关于通知bp meeting,超级节点和候选节都要通知,公布节点的回复情况和出席情况.
    7. 每个秘书处组织的议案,所有节点都要投票表态,否则参考惩罚机制,对节点收入进行扣除,这个是节点的基本义务。
    8. 区块链上定义用户,是看你是否拥有某个账户的私钥,你拥有一个账户的私钥,表明你拥有一个账户.那未激活的账户,他们都没有导入过私钥,怎么证明是我们EOSC上的用户。现在的那些账户,只是链上的一条记录而已,不是等同于链上用户。等哪天你导入私钥了,才能证明你是真正的用户。
    9. EOSC没有分发的过程,不能称之为空投。销毁“未激活”的EOSC,就等同于不经持有人同意销毁持有人的资产。EOSC启动时,所有的账户及资产都是来自于EOSIO在ICO期间的以太坊上的数据,ICO期间用户可是花了真金白银获取的EOS. EOSC启动时完全没有映射这个过程,启动时所有的账户以及资产已经存在了.不要销毁,将已冻结的解锁。希望大家慎重考虑冻结,并早日将解锁已冻结的币提上议程。
    10. 我支持冻结未激活用户剩下的20%的资产。
    11. 无论是pow还是pos还是dpos,还是当今世界任何一个政权,都是少数人(矿池/持仓大户/代理节点/政治集团)治理多数人。制度的好坏在于是否能够对决策统治者进行权力制衡,让其所作出的决定能符合大多数人的利益(不是所有人的利益)。可以看到原力社区治理里面对于一个提案是有赞成也有反对,相互制衡,而不是一言堂的,也不是开发团队说了算的,这个满足了相对去中心化的原则。
    12. 冻结决策一旦由社区投票选出的bp共同决策,能够多签通过,那么就符合【去中心化的治理机制】
    13. 冻结提案通过与否执行都是上链的,所有的变更都是在链上被记录的清清楚楚的,数据没有被篡改,符合【链上数据不可篡改】
    14. eos.io系统代码是允许升级代币合约的,也就是EOSIO的法律是允许变更合约规则的,只是所有的变更需要相关权利人共同签名通过即可,符合【代码即法律】
    15. 只同意按照上次通过的FIP#9议案严格执行,如果任何原因无法执行,要求回滚定期投票,用户定期投票都是看重的高收益,不销毁已经影响了收益率,有故意欺骗用户定投的嫌疑。


  • @billsou
    ##Some opinions on the eosforce community of the freezing motion

    Eosc didn't ico, eosforce founding team set up eosforce mainnet is issuing by consensus.Inactive accounts do not recognise the consensus.

    Major proposal should submit at least three days before the discussion by way of transfer notice account for more than 10 eosc holder.

    Super nodes and candidates in advance to the point of view that proposal and told the eosforce community.

    Free activation of eosc is a exploitation of today's holders.

    The eosforce node pays a high deposit and deducts the deposit for the node that does not attend the meeting.

    Regarding the notification bp meeting, the super node and the candidate section should be notified, and the Secretariat should announce the reply status and attendance of the node.

    For all proposals, all nodes must vote for the statement, otherwise the node income is deducted, this is the basic obligation of the node.

    The user is defined on the blockchain. It depends on whether you own an account or not. You have a private key for an account, indicating that you have the private key for this account. The inactive account, they have not imported the private key, how to prove that it is the user on our EOSC. Those accounts that do not have an operational record are just a record on the chain, not the same as the chain user. When you import the private key, you can prove that you are a real user.

    The EOSC has no distribution process and cannot be called an airdrop. Destroying an "inactive" EOSC is equivalent to destroying the holder's assets without the holder's consent. At the start of EOSC, all accounts and assets are from EOSIO's data in Ethereum during ICO. During ICO, users took EOS for real money. EOSC started without mapping this process at startup. The account and assets already exist. Do not destroy and unlock the frozen eosc. I hope that everyone will carefully consider the freeze and put the unlocked eosc on the agenda as soon as possible.

    I support to freeze the assets of the remaining 20% of inactive users.

    Pow or pos or dpos, or any power in the world, is a minority (mine large pool/position/political/proxy node group) governance to most people.System is good or bad is whether can carry on the power balance for decision-making ruler, make the decisions made by can meet most people's interests (not the interests of all).You can see the eoscforce inside the community governance for a proposal is in favor of and against, checks and balances, rather than a centralized, also not a development team, this can meet the relative principle of decentralization.

    Freeze decision once by community voted for bp decisions together, will be signed by a lot of, in accordance with the decentralized governance mechanism

    Whether the freezing proposal is executed or not is performed. All the changes are clearly recorded in the chain. The data has not been tampered with, and the data is not tamperable.

    Eos. IO system code is allowed to upgrade with the contract, namely EOSIO law is allowed to change the rules of contract, but all changes need to jointly signed by relevance obligee, comply with the code that is legal.

    Only agree to strictly enforce the FIPs#9 bill passed last time. If any reason cannot be implemented, it is required to roll back the fix-voting. The user's fix-voting is for a high-income, If the token is not destroyed, the profit rate is affected, and the user is deliberately deceived.


Log in to reply