B
@billsou
＃＃Some opinions on the eosforce community of the freezing motion
Eosc didn't ico, eosforce founding team set up eosforce mainnet is issuing by consensus.Inactive accounts do not recognise the consensus.
Major proposal should submit at least three days before the discussion by way of transfer notice account for more than 10 eosc holder.
Super nodes and candidates in advance to the point of view that proposal and told the eosforce community.
Free activation of eosc is a exploitation of today's holders.
The eosforce node pays a high deposit and deducts the deposit for the node that does not attend the meeting.
Regarding the notification bp meeting, the super node and the candidate section should be notified, and the Secretariat should announce the reply status and attendance of the node.
For all proposals, all nodes must vote for the statement, otherwise the node income is deducted, this is the basic obligation of the node.
The user is defined on the blockchain. It depends on whether you own an account or not. You have a private key for an account, indicating that you have the private key for this account. The inactive account, they have not imported the private key, how to prove that it is the user on our EOSC. Those accounts that do not have an operational record are just a record on the chain, not the same as the chain user. When you import the private key, you can prove that you are a real user.
The EOSC has no distribution process and cannot be called an airdrop. Destroying an "inactive" EOSC is equivalent to destroying the holder's assets without the holder's consent. At the start of EOSC, all accounts and assets are from EOSIO's data in Ethereum during ICO. During ICO, users took EOS for real money. EOSC started without mapping this process at startup. The account and assets already exist. Do not destroy and unlock the frozen eosc. I hope that everyone will carefully consider the freeze and put the unlocked eosc on the agenda as soon as possible.
I support to freeze the assets of the remaining 20% of inactive users.
Pow or pos or dpos, or any power in the world, is a minority (mine large pool/position/political/proxy node group) governance to most people.System is good or bad is whether can carry on the power balance for decision-making ruler, make the decisions made by can meet most people's interests (not the interests of all).You can see the eoscforce inside the community governance for a proposal is in favor of and against, checks and balances, rather than a centralized, also not a development team, this can meet the relative principle of decentralization.
Freeze decision once by community voted for bp decisions together, will be signed by a lot of, in accordance with the decentralized governance mechanism
Whether the freezing proposal is executed or not is performed. All the changes are clearly recorded in the chain. The data has not been tampered with, and the data is not tamperable.
Eos. IO system code is allowed to upgrade with the contract, namely EOSIO law is allowed to change the rules of contract, but all changes need to jointly signed by relevance obligee, comply with the code that is legal.
Only agree to strictly enforce the FIPs#9 bill passed last time. If any reason cannot be implemented, it is required to roll back the fix-voting. The user's fix-voting is for a high-income, If the token is not destroyed, the profit rate is affected, and the user is deliberately deceived.
